Queen's Park Observer

Queen's Park Observer

Share this post

Queen's Park Observer
Queen's Park Observer
The case for parliamentary privilege
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The case for parliamentary privilege

A Westminster expert weighs in

Sabrina Nanji's avatar
Sabrina Nanji
Oct 27, 2022
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Queen's Park Observer
Queen's Park Observer
The case for parliamentary privilege
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

ABOVE THE FOLD

FORD FACES THE MUSIC (SORT OF) — After ducking reporters and Oppo critics following revelations that he and his then-Solicitor General were summoned to testify at the federal Emergencies Act inquiry, Premier DOUG FORD showed up to Wednesday’s Question Period to take a grilling.

Ford in the House. Photo: Getty

“This is the federal inquiry into the federal government’s use of the federal Emergencies Act,” Ford said during the morning debate under a hammering from NDP MPP and leadership candidate MARIT STILES.

Emphasis on it being a “policing matter,” not a “political matter,” too. “Politicians don’t direct the police,” Ford said.

In court, likely next week, the Premier is set to argue that testifying doesn’t jive with “parliamentary privilege” — which exempts politicians from being subpoenaed to attend court or public inquiries as a witness so it doesn’t interfere with their legislative duties.

Stiles fired back in the House, accusing Ford of “hiding” and calling his claim…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Sabrina Nanji
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More